On Oct 29, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:

Paul Querna wrote:

FWIW, I don't believe in latest and greatest linux distro as a good measure, but I do believe that there are only a few platforms that we should make design decisions around:
- Linux 2.6
- FreeBSD 7
- Solaris 10
- Windows Vista
If something is *fast* or *good* and can be done on all of the above platforms, I would argue we should do it from a design perspective, and I'm very much opposed to limiting how we design stuff based on the constraints of other less popular operating systems, cf epoll/kqueue/event ports.

I think we shouldn't forget that we have MPMs - if we need to support a non mainstream platform, at the very least make sure that at least one functional and acceptable alternative MPM exists for that platform.


I tend to agree... as long as the architectural design doesn't
prevent people from creating (or keeping) MPMs, then this is all
good. Believe it or not, as people on the front-lines of handling
Apache setup and support for organizations can attest to, MPMs are a
valued feature.

Reply via email to