On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Brian was planning taking a bigger hacksaw in though with > refactoring the VM allocation, so i kinda want to wait until that is done > before trying to clean some of this up. Am indeed intending to go at lua_State creation and management with a hacksaw. Lifecycle management should be tied to pools, not ad-hoc structures attached to server_rc, conn_rec, or request_rec. The most primitive part (create a lua_state attached to a pool, only apr dependent) is there, but good idioms or convenience functions are lacking, and most of the code doesn't use the new form, yet. -Brian
