On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:25:15 +0200 Issac Goldstand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cute. I haven't looked at the code yet, but the concept sounds > awesome. > > It would be great if there was a 2.2 backport so I could see if I can > get it working in our existing stack at work - we're just upgrading > our web-stack for the next few years, and the latest CoolStack is 2.2 > so no real chance (for us, at least) of adopting this in the next few > years. It won't work as a module in 2.2.x. But I do plan to make a patch to enable the functionality there: it should be much easier having figured it out as a module. Watch this space! > I'll try to poke around myself this week but having just come back to > work from birth-leave I'm really not sure if I'll have a chance. Your feedback will be appreciated as and when you find time :-) > Before I jump in too deep, Nick is there any particular reason that > you think that a backport should NOT be attempted? No reason at all ... see above. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
