> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: William A. Rowe, Jr. > Gesendet: Samstag, 29. November 2008 04:06 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Preferred versions of libtool and autoconf for T&R > > Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > Any objections going with autoconf 2.63 and libtool 1.5.26? > > > > If autoconf 2.63 is seen as too risky I would go back to > autoconf 2.61. > > I see no remaining issues for 2.63... solid choice. The endianess > issues of 2.62 should all be addressed. >
autoconf 2.63 still emits the warnings for APR / APR-UTIL configure options passed to it. The following patch should fix this: Index: configure.in =================================================================== --- configure.in (revision 721659) +++ configure.in (working copy) @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ sinclude(build/find_apu.m4) sinclude(acinclude.m4) +dnl We don't want our confingure to emit any warnings for any +dnl APR / APR-UTIL configure options +AC_DISABLE_OPTION_CHECKING + dnl XXX we can't just use AC_PREFIX_DEFAULT because that isn't subbed in dnl by configure until it is too late. Is that how it should be or not? dnl Something seems broken here. Any objections? Otherwise I would commit to trunk and propose it for backport. Regards Rüdiger
