On 12/09/2008 02:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Paul Querna wrote: >>> >>> The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org. >>> >>> All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda >>> needs some more thought. >> >> My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which I last refactored, but >> was bogusly introduced for mod_negotiation) must die, now. >> >> Votes? >> > > Can we simply revert r620133 (et.al.) and then start from *that* > point? That is, get to a known OK state and then boot > fast_internal_subrequest?
Currently I would be more keen to know the issues we are still facing, so that we can keep these cases and issues in mind when we do a rewrite of this stuff. Regards Rüdiger
