On Dec 9, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Chris Darroch wrote:
This is all fairly simple, I think, especially if
MatchNotAny/RequireNone is removed as well so that Require retains
its
apparent meaning everywhere. See if the patch below meets your
expectations; if so, I'll commit it and update the docs.
Sorry, here's a slightly updated one without any whitespace issues;
it should apply cleanly against the latest SVN trunk as of a few
minutes ago.
I don't see a problem with RequireNone inverting the logic, and
I think it would actually be useful for blocking a set of bad
clients. Is it difficult to include that without MatchNotAny?
In any case, I'd prefer that we clean this up before the next
attempt at an alpha. I wanted to do it this week but have run out
of time (I don't want to commit and fly). Can you commit this or
something like it?
....Roy
