On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:31:31 -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[email protected]> wrote:
> Takashi Sato wrote: > > Event MPM has been Experimental for a long time. > > Is there any plan to mark as Productional MPM? > > Or any plan to drop it like Leader, Threadpool or Perchild? > > Right now the push is to bring Simple up to the caliber of all > of the above, and replace 95% of people's applications. > > But we are talking ERS 2.4/3.0 lifetime, not any 2.0 or 2.2 > elder statesmen. > On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:25:32 -0800 Paul Querna <[email protected]> wrote: > Takashi Sato wrote: > > Event MPM has been Experimental for a long time. > > Is there any plan to mark as Productional MPM? > > Or any plan to drop it like Leader, Threadpool or Perchild? > > It should be moved out of experimental. It is a stable MPM, and its > experiment proved correct imo. > > I was hoping to focus more on the simple mpm, as I really don't like the > code organization and how much copy and paste there is in the... legacy > MPMs, but that really shouldn't drive where we put the event mpm. > > -Paul > Thanks. I thought Event MPM would be dropped. I believe PR43359 "trunk EventMPM's graceful restart/stop are not graceful" has to be fixed if it is stable MPM. -- Takashi Sato <[email protected]>
