On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > On Jan 8, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > >> Vote closed with one -1, and no other votes. >> >> I guess 2.3.1 was DOA. >> >> I think the issues that killed it have been fixed in trunk. Thoughts on >> starting 2.3.2 early next week? >> > > +1
Is there any concern about the SNI support sitting in trunk? IIUC Joe's specific concern (testable failure) referenced in the stalled backport proposal are addressed by a later trunk commit, but there is still the spectre of similar but undiscovered cases and the issue of non-SNI clients. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com
