On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Brian McCallister <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Paul Querna <[email protected]> wrote: > >> r742218 adds conn_rec::current_thread, and implements support for it on >> all the common Unix MPMs..... >> >> It turns out its really hard to use the request_rec in the MPMs, but yet >> again its in trouble of where we draw the lines between MPMs and >> everything else. > > conn_rec is thread safe relative to the request_rec, so has same effect :-)
Actually, is this a true statement? -Brian (who thinks processes should be enough) > > Thanks! > > -Brian >
