Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Mladen Turk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:Jeff Trawick wrote: (no plans here to touch WinNT MPMs, and I don't see any compelling reason to leave it broken; it should build as before once the inevitable minor slips are corrected) The major problem with that is the huge amount of platform dependent code for managing the service, registry and fork. (Although -k install and -k uninstall could be a separate utility app)Maybe its the lack of sleep, but I see that as a separate code reuse issue. I'm not trying to address code reuse with this effort, except with minor details where the solution to cutting the ties to the MPM involves a shared definition.
Too bad then :) I was hoping someone will address the separation of child process management from the mpm. Majority of this stuff is common and duplicated across mpms while there can be an api for that thought. Regards -- ^(TM)
