Torsten Foertsch <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed 01 Apr 2009, Dan Poirier wrote: >> Lars Eilebrecht <[email protected]> writes: >> > Torsten Foertsch wrote: >> > >> > [mod_include DATE_LOCAL bug] >> > >> >> Is this a known bug? >> > >> > It's probably this one: >> > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39369 >> >> I think that's right. It's a test for Joe's fix for 39369, that has >> only been applied to trunk. It would be nice to backport that fix so >> the stable release doesn't fail tests (or else do something with that >> test). > > Here is a patch that works for 2.2.11. The mod_rerwite patch cures the > failure in t/modules/rewrite.t: > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46428 > > in 2.2.11. ... > Should I attach these patches to the problem reports in bugzilla or is > that useless because they wont be backported officially? > > Torsten
These are two separate problems that just happen to have been fixed recently in trunk. I haven't looked at the rewrite one. I don't know any reason why these couldn't be backported, but someone with commit privileges will have to propose them for backporting. Dan
