Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 05/02/2009 09:37 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> On 05/02/2009 12:21 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> >>> If we can ensure the StrictSNIVHostCheck always exists, but exits when it >>> is not supported with; >> I try to adjust it if no one beats me to it. > > Ok. Done in r770907.
Looks great! A quick review suggests that this code is ready to consider as-is for backport to 2.2.12, but let me spend a bit more review of this on this Monday before throwing in a +1.