On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] wrote: >> Author: jim >> Date: Fri May 22 12:49:41 2009 >> New Revision: 777499 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=777499&view=rev >> Log: >> No need (that I can see) to have the -FTP suffix here > > -1 Veto, reverting. Not even LICENSE, which would normally be just > the AL 2.0 can overlap, because httpd/LICENSE contains many third > party licenses; cp -r, or svn export ftp atop an httpd tree, and > you have just deleted the additional licenses applicable to httpd. > > > The reason was spelled out in; > > Revision 664603 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs] > Modified Mon Jun 9 02:10:31 2008 UTC (11 months, 1 week ago) by wrowe > File length: 4595 byte(s) > Diff to previous 605333 (colored) > > The filenames chosen for the mod_ftp repository are deliberately laid out > to permit the user to export or unpack mod_ftp on top of an existing httpd > tree without file conflicts. Although Win32 and Netware still need a bit > of patch or magic to inject the mod_ftp build into the httpd build.
that seems silly. why can't it build like every other module does?
