Bill, William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb: > Zarro sympathy for the pain those distros cause to their users by forking > around. You're not thinking about users benefit here. If we can simplify things for users with only a rename which costs us nothing I see no reason why not doing so. The reason why distros renamed apxs from AP2 to apxs2 is very simple: because they provide(d) both Apache13 and Apache2x. I came self over boxes which had both Apache13 and Apache2x installed (and there are valid reasons for such, f.e. because Oracle delivers an AP13 modified beast with closed mods); the 'which' approach then finds always the AP13 apxs. Anyway cant get why not looking for both automatically? I used it, and that works fine - first look for apxs2, and second for apxs, and then apxs2 is used if found. Sure that its possible to specify the full path at commandline, but tell me a reason why we should make it harder for users than needed?
just my 2ct. Gün.
