Nick Kew <n...@webthing.com> writes: > On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:14:16 -0400 > Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> IMO potential HTTP violations should remain open until somebody can >> evaluate them and fix it or explain why the report isn't valid. >> Thoughts? > > +1. > > Similar applies (less strongly) to other old bugs that haven't been > evaluated just 'cos noone has found a round tuit.
Makes sense. I've re-opened these. > For some bugs like these, a great exercise might be to restructure > them, perhaps with use of meta-bugs like PR 43454. That makes > things easier as and when someone does find time to hack it. Sounds like a good idea. Let me see if I have any round tuits lying around... -- Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com>
