Sorry to dig up this old thread again but some users of my unofficial binary
have been complaining that it still says Win32.

So any chances somebody could look at this again. It's a rather trivial
change I think.

~Jorge


On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 11:00 PM, Jorge Schrauwen <jorge.schrau...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> I just tried lots of diferent comment styles like #, ', ... till i found
> one that worked. never though there would be more that one... makes sence
> though, especially for larger blocks of comment.
>
> So here is an updated diff file.
>
> On 7/26/06, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/26/2006 10:10 PM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
>> > Ok this is my first path so please bare with me and review.
>> >
>> > Since I'm rather new to C I did a lot of research and testing on this.
>> > More information regarding the changes:
>> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/06/05/x64/default.aspx#S4
>> >
>> > ----------- os\win32\os.h -----------
>> >
>> > --- os.h.orig    2006-04-22 03:53:06.000000000 +0200
>> > +++ os.h    2006-07-26 21:22:24.000516000 +0200
>> > @@ -38,7 +38,11 @@
>> > #include <io.h>
>> > #include <fcntl.h>
>> >
>> > +//Checking the architecture we are compiling for (Itanium 64-bit, x64
>> > (AMD64/EM64T) or x86)
>>
>> I cannot comment on the subject itself as I am not a windows man, but only
>> on
>> the style: Please do not use C++ style comments like //. Please use always
>> /* */.
>> Regarding style the following page is very helpful:
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/styleguide.html
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> RĂ¼diger
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ~Jorge

Attachment: os.h.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to