Hi Nick, I looked at the code (I am not a coder) and wondered what made you say "it's geared clearly to the very small server. "
Rgds - Fred Nick Kew wrote: > > Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> Nick Kew wrote: >>> Is this worth hacking up, or more trouble than it saves? >> >> It seems it already exists (I haven't tested it, though): >> ftp://ftp.monshouwer.eu/pub/linux/mod_antiloris/mod_antiloris-0.3.tar.bz2 >> > Looks almost what I had in mind. But it's geared clearly to > the very small server. Which is, to be fair, exactly what's > most threatened by slowloris. I have a meeting now, but will > test-drive tonight. > > I see it's also Apache-licensed :-) > > -- > Nick Kew > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_noloris%3A-mitigating-against-slowloris-style-attack-tp24203476p24282962.html Sent from the Apache HTTP Server - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
