Re: svn commit: r798359 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_kernel.c modules/ssl/ssl_engine_vars.c modules/ssl/ssl_util_ssl.c support/ab.c

[Guenter Knauf]

Hi,

Paul Querna schrieb:
> -1 veto, please revert this commit.
done:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=798508

> Unless I missed something, these changes were not voted on in the
> STATUS file.
no, you missed nothing, I was also very suprised about Bill's reply. My
own intention was very clear since I even didnt directly propose the
backport, but first only posted the 2.2.x patch to the list in order to
hear other's oppinions.

>  I think wrowe's endorsement was... badly worded.
sorry, English is not my maiden's language, but from my understanding
Bill's post was cristal-clear:
"Since 2.2.12 just shipped, I'd say apply it.  It will be easier for
everyone to validate from svn, no?"

and even more clear was this:
"So +1 for committing and I'll commit to helping review-after-commit."
review-after-commit means for me in this case CTR instead of RTC.

Gün.