On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:32 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jul 27, 2009, at 7:33 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Guenter Knauf schrieb:
Hi,
Sander Temme schrieb:
On Jul 21, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Peter Sylvester wrote:
Are there any plans to make mod_ssl compilable against
openssl-1.0.0betaX,
as far as I see, just some STACK things and casts need to be
cleaned.
Trunk became aware of OpenSSL trunk a while ago... but I don't
recall
putting that up for backport. I'll do so when I have come
cycles.
I've yesterday compiled both HEAD and 2.2.x branch with OpenSSL
1.0.0
beta 3, and that went fine - although I have a very picky
compiler for
NetWare which normally breaks for every type mismatch ...
whoops - I mixed up the include paths; Peter is right - seems
that we
need to backport these:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=748396
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=749466
based on the above HEAD patches here's a 2.2.x branch patch:
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/openssl-1.x-2.2.x.diff
please check and test if I catched all - I've tested on NetWare
with
OpenSSL 0.9.7m, 0.9.8k and 1.0.0 beta3, and that went fine.
If nobody objects I'll propose this for backport.
Since 2.2.12 just shipped, I'd say apply it. It will be easier for
everyone to validate from svn, no?
So +1 for committing and I'll commit to helping review-after-commit.
Huh? For 2.2??
Yes. This patchwork is straightforward, it simply needs dedicated
eyes
to review and confirm on all platforms.
But my vote alone wouldn't do it, and _that_ was the misunderstanding.
Sorry to Guenter and others for the confusion.
Seeing as there are two votes against applying before the STATUS
juggling
act, you would need five votes now, including Guenter's and mine, to
actually move forward from 2.2. branch in this manner.
What's wrong with a pointer to the patch in STATUS and a vote there?
