Gregg L. Smith wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> +/-1 >>> [+1] Release httpd-2.2.13 as GA >> >> This is looking fine on windows, is up at /dev/dist as -src-win32, >> and binaries will follow in the morning. > > non-binding +9/10 on Windows. Please see PR 47659 for the last 1/10. > This is only a build process failure due to a small oversight in the > makefile.
I offered an alternative solution (one based on too many /bin/sh for loops :-) Could you test 2.2 branch or even just apr-util/1.3.x branch so we have this right in the next release? I'm still puzzled, since my modern cmd.exe shells never complain about empty for %x in () do loops.
