Hi Brian, On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:12:11 UTC, Brian Havard <brian.hav...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nick Kew wrote: > > Paul Smedley wrote: > > > >>> [ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk > >>> [ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk > >>> > >>> (I'm +1 on both votes) > >> > >> Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2 > >> maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role. > >> > >> I've been building Apache2 on OS/2 for the last 4 years or so, I just > >> enver got around to submitting patches. If the support is pulled, it > >> will make my life harder continuing to maintain the port. > > > > If you've been maintaining it independently to date, you could > > presumably continue to do so on exactly the same basis if it > > were pulled from the official release. So that's one option. > > > > I see you've posted a patch to d...@apr. I am, alas, not > > competent to review it. If anyone on the APR and HTTPD > > projects has OS2 and the time to review it, maybe this > > could be a start to reviving OS2 support, and to your > > working with the apache community. > > I know I've been absent for a long time but I once again have a bit of > spare time so I can review, test & commit patches from Paul. Does anyone > object if I start by bringing the OS/2 MPM back from the dead? > Specifically, reversing r758899? Just a comment regarding testing - I assume you only have an EMX environment? I'm using klibc for all my stuff - http://svn.netlabs.org/klibc It would be good to ensure that I don't break anything for EMX :) -- Cheers, Paul.
