*Rich*, Nick Kew wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Nick... >> >> should we discuss an alternate name? Or should I simply revert the patch >> vetoed on trunk? > > I'm easy on the name. > > Let's ping DrBacchus - this was his feature request :-) > >> Can we compromise on the name NotFoundHandler, MissingFileHandler, >> NotFoundAction, MissingFileAction, or any of a dozen other possible >> variations that don't contain the misleading word "Default"? > > FWIW, I preferred your earlier suggestion of Fallback[Handler|Action].
your input please? It would be nice to fix rather than revert, but I'll personally do either on Monday, because we can't tag a 2.3 alpha with an veto still open.
