Hi, William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb: > Guenter Knauf wrote: >> well, thats fine, but at least FZ only uses it because mod_ftp claims to >> support it - so why do we so if we anyway dont take action on it but >> only fail? >> Lets remove it from FEAT reply unless we really support it, and take >> action on the command. > > Reread the spec. did...
> FEAT -> UTF8 tells the client that utf8 is preferred. On unix systems > today, that is largely true. On Windows, it's absolutely true from the > httpd perspective. And I'm conceding it might be wrong for OS2 or Netware > and need your feedback. FEAT -> UTF8 does not say UTF8 is the only format > to expect, only that it's the format that should be presumed. not 100% sure, but ATM would say NW does not support UTF8 with the filenames without conversion ... (we had problems in the past with filenames on httpd autoindexed pages, and need mod_chatset_lite to workaround this) > FEAT UTF8 has no associated OPTS, please read the spec. OPTS takes no > arg "ON", that's for certain ;-) k, I dont care much about the error since its ignored by FZ and IE as it seems .... Gün.
