Ruediger Pluem wrote:

>>  Version: APACHE_VERSION
>>  Release: APACHE_RELEASE
>> +Epoch: APACHE_EPOCH00%{release}
> 
> Why APACHE_EPOCH00%{release} and not just APACHE_EPOCH?

Someone wanting to roll their own spec file will most probably want to
set their own value for release, this makes that possible.

>>  URL: http://httpd.apache.org/
>>  Vendor: Apache Software Foundation
>>  Source0: http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-%{version}.tar.bz2
>>  License: Apache License, Version 2.0
>>  Group: System Environment/Daemons
>>  BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
>> -BuildPrereq: apr-devel, apr-util-devel, openldap-devel, db4-devel, 
>> expat-devel, findutils, perl, pkgconfig, zlib-devel, pcre-devel >= 5.0
>> +BuildPrereq: apr-devel, apr-util-devel, openldap-devel, db4-devel, 
>> expat-devel, findutils, perl, pkgconfig, zlib-devel, pcre-devel >= 5.0, 
>> distcache-devel >= 1.4
> 
> Was this change intended?

Yes, though I left it out the commit message by accident. The SRPM won't
build without distcache-devel present.

Regards,
Graham
--

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to