On 09/27/2009 08:31 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:59 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Author: minfrin
>> Date: Sun Sep 27 11:59:10 2009
>> New Revision: 819289
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=819289&view=rev
>> Log:
>> ...promote.
>>
>> Modified:
>>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/CHANGES
>>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
>>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_vars.c
>>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/ssl/ssl_toolkit_compat.h
>>    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/support/ab.c
>>
> 
> It is fine to use a commit log of simply "promote" for STATUS, if that is
> all that is modified.  (I used to enjoy Justin's updates here on what jazz
> album he was listening to...  I guess people use Twitter for that now.)
> 
> When you commit code, you need to include a real commit log, regardless of
> the branch.  Look at the information available for the last two updates to
> this file, then look at earlier commits:
> 
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_vars.c
> 

+1

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Reply via email to