> Ricardo Cantu wrote: > > That's the problem with mod_fcgid right now with out the patch. > argv[0] is different but mod_fcgid is not considering it different. It is > lumping together by inode only and not paying attention to basename (argv[0]). > Which can be different when using symbolic links. > The patch is so it can properly respect your statement.
> Ah ha - I misread your statement. So, is the patch acceptable?
