On 10/30/09 1:29 PM, "Albert Lash" <[email protected]> wrote:
> But in the end, it is awesome for containing memory leaks and > automatically re-spawning fastcgi processes. An external process-manager can do the same. My point was "do we really want/need this complexity inside httpd?" Also, the config just seems so "clunky" compared to the proxy config. > In closing, I'll add that I'm greatly appreciative of both Apache and > mod_fcgid and was thrilled when I learned that mod_fcgid was getting > merged into the Apache code base. I was too, but mostly just because mod_fastcgi was horrible in my testing. -- Brian Akins
