Issac Goldstand wrote: > Nope, it's not what I was using. I wanted to keep it 2.2.x compatible > since I need this module in production, although I completely agree with > the point.
We also use socache in v2.2, and to solve that problem, I backported the socache modules as external modules. Not all the socache modules build cleanly, but the key ones we needed did. Regards, Graham --
