-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Greg Stein wrote: > Apache remains the broad solution, but for narrow requirements, people > will select something that is easier to handle for their particular > situation. > > I wouldn't say "wrong", but more along the lines of "not as well-suited"
I partially agree, but we have to take into account that some of those httpd's, like lighttpd, are replacing Apache plain and simple. Don't get me wrong. I love Apache. I've written tons of articles about it since the very early days. And I haven't released any mod_openpgp code for any other thing other than Apache for a reason: i love it. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman Independent Linux and Security Consultant - OWASP - SANS - OISSG http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAkr8Is4ACgkQAlpOsGhXcE1tFwCdEAEZQDVG9c2qqqqyNXwYBk2/ VgIAn2emSNcp1xwXa2bxgoK09JKMcsV4 =T/Fe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
