On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: >> What advantages does fcgid have over proxy_fcgi (except being ready)? > > integrated, on-demand process management
How valuable is that? In most cases a static number of backends seems fine. >> mod_fcgid isn't in 2.2, right? > > mod_fcgid is actually not bundled with the HTTP server. It is > released on its own cycle, and supports httpd 2.0.x, 2.2.x, and trunk > (future httpd 2.4.x) with one delivery. Ah, nice. What's the reason it's not bundled though? In this case, I'd love to see support for TCP/IP backends too. Shouldn't be too hard to implement. >> So what's the plan for 2.4? Have both of them? Or is mod_proxy_fcgi >> expected to be not ready for 2.4? > > mod_fcgid will support 2.4. proxy-fcgi folk(s), care to speak up on your > baby? Olaf
