On 12/02/2009 09:53 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> > Yes, that fixes it, makes a lot of sense. > > What's interesting is, that the function address changes during the > first restart, but not any more when doing further restarts. So the > initial start ends up with a different load order than all of the > following restarts. Something to keep in mind at least in case it's new > in 2.3 - and about 60 other places to check which use optional > functions, whether the function pointers are correctly reinitialized. > > Thanks! > > Will you commit? Done as r886324. Regards Rüdiger
