On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:34 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like your opinion for the patch I submitted in bug #48340. > Several people asked in time for a similar feature, to avoid exposing > password with AuthLDAPBindDN/Password when anonymous search is not > feasible.
Hope commit over the next couple of days, just dispelled the two bogus concerns I had. Can you suggest some doc on how your basic auth usernames have to relate to what is able to bind directly to the LDAP server? I think the arrangement on your server w/ the UID being able to bind as-is may be somewhat uncommon (paging any platform gurus) -- Eric Covener [email protected]
