On 1/19/2010 7:03 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Sander Temme <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Jan 19, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Paul Querna wrote: >> >>> I'm planning roughly on doing another 2.3.x-alpha tag on this late >>> Wednesday, January 20th. Should give us enough time to vote on it >>> over the weekend, and ship it out on Monday/tuesday next week, during >>> the hackathon at G.
Thanks, that gives me a bit of time to take a last look at a couple win32 build things. >> Do we have an APR to roll into a *-deps, or are we canning the notion of >> *-deps until such things solidify? If this package does not contain expat or pcre, my personal -1 will remain on shipping -deps* at all. If we see fit to capture an apr, apr-util, expat and pcre, I can buy that if it is API stable, but you could have guessed that :) Remember that unlike zlib, openssl, openldap etc, these dependencies are mandatory. [I note that expat is in apr still, although it is not scheduled to be bundled in the future, based on apr 2.0 svn]. > For APR, we can use 1.4.1: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/tags/1.4.1/ Actually 1.4.1 is going not-released, because of a significant hash/table regression. But I'll make life easy, and tag 1.4.2 [essentially 1.4.1 less that broken commit] before lunchtime tomorrow. As 1.4.1 saw no -other- objections than this problem observed at SVN, there's almost no reason it won't be approved. > For APR-Util, I think we still need to use a snapshot, as there has > not been a suitable release or tag. I know httpd-everything is requiring an apr bump, but do we need apr-util 1.4 changes, besides crypto which might or might not be ready? [Still waiting for feedback from the author, the 1.4 tree should not be shipped as is IMHO.]
