On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Lars Kruse <[email protected]> wrote:
> This new behaviour covers the two use cases described above (even though I did > not check it in an Active Directory setup). Patch is nice and simple, but it would be great if someone with AD leanings could confirm that this combination of HTTP username, attribute, and basedn is likely to result in something that can bind in a typical AD install. -- Eric Covener [email protected]
