On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Stefan Fritsch <s...@sfritsch.de> wrote:
> The recommended setup is to map separate URLs for DAV and script
> execution to the content. It has been like this since at least 2.0.
>
> The patch intentionally breaks existing configs that rely on the
> ability to use the same URLs for DAV and script execution. Is this not
> an acceptable change from 2.2 to 2.4 (if properly documented), as it
> makes life a lot easier for people who use the recommended setup?

I don't see how your patch would "intentionally" break - the failure
mechanism is that the source scripts are served - not that a
configuration error stops the server from running.  -- justin

Reply via email to