On Feb 23, 2010, at 11:02 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think this is a little misunderstanding. Yes I mean the WebDAV ACL spec 
> features, but I we don't have implemented this into mod_dav. We implemented 
> it into our own module (Catacomb) and therefore we need to extent mod_dav to 
> handle the ACP.


What kind of extensions did you add to mod_dav?  These are all in TRUNK right 
now, but no in 2.2 branch:

DAV Option Patch to allow adding thing to the DAV or Allow headers:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg45113.html


DAV Resource Type Patch to allow additional resource type responses:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg45253.html


DAV Provider Patch add hooks for dav modules to get access to the filename:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg45288.html


Was this the kind of things you need to add to mod_dav to get your module 
working to do acl support?

I am sure you also had to add hooks or something to do the acl stuff in 
mod_dav, but that was the last part of mod_dav_acl[1] patch that I am splitting 
up once I get the last supporting patch in (still needs a little more work):

DAV ETag Patch:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg47239.html

Brian

[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/moddavacl/





> 
> - Markus
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: Greg Stein [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 21. Februar 2010 21:05
>> An: [email protected]
>> Betreff: Re: ACL changes in mod_dav
>> 
>> This is pretty cool. I'm assuming you're referring to the WebDAV ACL
>> spec features?
>> 
>> Every time that I started to look into the issue, I ran into one basic
>> issue: how to notify the multiple processes that the ACLs around a
>> particular namespace have changed. How did you handle that?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>> 
>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 23:23,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I have added ACL features to the mod_dav module. Could you tell me the
>>> correct way to get this changes reviewed and into to official
>>> mod_dav-source?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Markus
>>> 

Reply via email to