On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:28:46AM +0000, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Noirin Shirley <noi...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Dan Poirier <poir...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > >> How about Apache Web Server? Httpd is just the name of one of the > >> files, and not even the one people run to start it most of the time. > >> Apache HTTP Server is fine, but Apache Web Server is equally correct, > >> easier to pronounce, and less geeky :-) > > > > I also like this option. > > From the peanut gallery, eww. =P > > +1 to "Apache HTTP Server" (long name) and "httpd" (short name). > > I don't see a compelling reason to rebrand now - we would only want to > do so if we wanted to do that as a major 'publicity' push which I > doubt is on our collective radar screen. > > (BTW, the InConSisteNt capitalization always bugged me to no end...) -- > justin
Another +1 from the peanut gallery for "Apache HTTP Server" and "httpd". -aaron
