On Apr 2, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 3/31/2010 4:46 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>
>>> Why not just change the signature of ap_process_resource_config() ?
>>> What is the anticipated use of these functions? (IOW, how much pain
>>> does it introduce?)
>>
>> I see an advantage of two API's if we revert ap_process_resource_config()
>> to what it was supposed to be, a processor for a single config file. Then
>> ap_process_resource_config_ex() is really
>> ap_process_resource_configs_matching()
>> or something like that.
>
> That is a very natural division.
>
+1
