On Apr 14, 2010, at 3:38 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 04/13/2010 10:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> On Apr 13, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> >>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 3:58 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/07/2010 03:40 PM, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: Mittwoch, 7. April 2010 15:32 >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Arranging mod_proxy_balancer in trunk >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> In mod_proxy_balancer after >>>>>> runtime = find_session_route(*balancer, r, &route, &sticky, url); >>>>>> >>>>>> There is a logic that belongs to the LB implementation, my >>>>>> idea is to add a >>>>>> apr_status_t (*updatelbstatus)(proxy_balancer *balancer, proxy_worker >>>>>> *elected, server_rec *s); >>>>>> in the proxy_balancer_method (mod_proxy.h) and call the LB >>>>>> implementation. >>>>>> >>>>>> Comments? >>>>> >> >> You should also likely pass a int * (or something) to handle >> the requirement to also "know" total_factor outside of that >> call... Of course, lbstatus is something that outside code >> shouldn't really know about, but that's a whole 'nother >> point ;) > > total_factor in fact depends on the LB implementation I don't think it > should go outside it. >
I agree... So elected == runtime then??
