On Apr 28, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
Oh, by the way, what was your answer for:
"There is a number of serious security problems in apache that we
have
fixed, and that have been offered them back, and they refused."
@
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=108655793112947&w=2
Why would there be an 'answer' to a) a statement and b) something that
was posted on somebody elses mailing list?
May i know what did you refuse and why did you refuse?
You'd have to refer to a specific bug report, patch, mailing list
reference, or at least a specific issue for anyone to comment
intelligently -- especially if this 6+ years ago.
This is probably more on-topic at the users discussion list unless
there's an actual question about the development of Apache HTTP
Server.
Having seen this referenced several times in the last few weeks (was
there a news story that resurrected this?) I've wondered about this
claim, too. Can someone who remembers this incident please speak up
and set the record straight about what actually happened? It seems
improbable to me that there's just one side of this story, and that
nobody remembers it from our perspective. What was refused, and why?
Or is that not actually how it happened?
--
Rich Bowen
[email protected]
