On 6/2/2010 4:21 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 5:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 6/2/2010 3:39 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >>> Mod_proxy and mod_ssl (if ssl toolkit was >>> detected) make good candidates for moving from "no" to at least "default". >> >> mod_ssl was 'no' simply because of concerns about cryptographic law and >> users in all these crazy jurisdictions. But I'm willing to consider 'yes' >> on the basis that if openssl is not found, the default becomes 'no'. > > Did you really mean no->yes or no->most for mod_ssl? > > Or are you also thinking some of the innocuous "most" move to yes > (rewrite, expires, headers). > > Finally, remember that on unix if you don't do your ./configure > homework you end up with all this stuff static.
Sure, that's the beauty of --enable-mods-shared=most. Yes, I meant 'most' :)
