On Jun 1, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Considering that 2.3/trunk is back to limbo-land, I'd like > to propose that we be more "aggressive" is backporting some > items. Even if under experimental, it would be nice if slotmem > and socache were backported. I also like the refactoring of > the providers for proxy in trunk as compared to 2.2, but > last time I suggested it, it looked like 2.3/2.4 was close(r) > to reality... > > comments...?
Amusingly (at least to me), I happened upon an old post by Joel Spolsky from 2002: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/PickingShipDate.html "For Systems With Millions of Customers and Millions of Integration Points, Prefer Rare Releases. You can do it like Apache: one release at the beginning of the Internet Bubble, and one release at the end. Perfect." I personally think we have enough to release for users to chew on: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/new_features_2_4.html PHP should largely move to FastCGI, so module compatibility should not be a problem. Any idea about other popular modules? WSGI? mod_perl? Are they ready for HEAD? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
