On 2010-06-03 at 22:28, "William A. Rowe Jr." <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not because of binary compatibility, but because users have certain > expectations when they move from x.y.15 to x.y.16 that nothing much > has changed, it's just lots of fixes. And if your backport ideas > include a lot of config changes, well that further breaks the users > expectations. Absolutely. We can't be making changes in 2.2.x that break existing configurations. Dan
