> -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Orton > Sent: Dienstag, 8. Juni 2010 17:36 > To: dev@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR 17629 and all that > > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 05:20:16PM +0200, "Plüm, Rüdiger, > VF-Group" wrote: > > Is it possible to have any non subrequest specific filters > below the ap_subreq_core_filter_handle? > > It is no that the current patch does not handle this but > wouldn't it be possible > > to just throw away any filter between > > > > r->output_filters and ap_subreq_core_filter_handle without > any further test? > > I'd spent some time working on exactly that approach, trying > to answer > that question. But surprisingly the answer is "yes" - the > subreq filter > has ftype=AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET, so any filter registered with > an ftype > greater than that can be inserted and will work (so long as > it doesn't > depend on seeing EOS).
Ah. So deleting everything between r->output_filters and ap_subreq_core_filter will not delete too much (they all belong to the subrequest), but we may miss subrequest specific filters between ap_subreq_core_filter and the protocol output filters if not following your patch, correct? Regards Rüdiger
