08.06.2010 14:13, Mikhail T. ???????(??):
Why does the apr_vformatter -- and thus all its callers (apr_psprintf,
logging-functions, etc.) reject the %p format (replacing it with words
``bogus %p'')?
The format is for outputting pointers and is supported by the
C-library's printf-family.
If this is a deliberate limitation, I'd like to know, what the
motivations are. If it is simply an omission, I may be able to offer a
patch...
Ok, replying to myself... Apparently, one is supposed to use %pp instead
of simple %p to output pointers. This is not well-implemented, however,
because real printf would left-pad pointers with zeros, which is not
even possible to request with the current apr_vformatter implementation.
The 0x-prefix is not output either, but that one can request by
explicitly putting it into format.
Also, trying to use %pt (for the thread ID) -- gets flagged by the gcc's
-Wformat, because these functions are, somewhat misleadingly, declared
"printf-like".
-mi
