Hi Joe,
On 07.06.2010 23:16, [email protected] wrote:
Author: jorton
Date: Mon Jun 7 21:16:50 2010
New Revision: 952443
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=952443&view=rev
Log:
- make more robust against failure cases
Modified:
httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t
Modified: httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t?rev=952443&r1=952442&r2=952443&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t (original)
+++ httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/apache/pr17629.t Mon Jun 7 21:16:50 2010
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ use Apache::Test;
use Apache::TestUtil;
use Apache::TestRequest;
-plan tests => 2, need [qw(cgi include deflate case_filter)];
+plan tests => 4, need [qw(cgi include deflate case_filter)];
Would it be OK to allow cgid here too? Like
--- ./t/apache/pr17629.t 2010-06-07 23:16:50.000000000 +0200
+++ ./t/apache/pr17629.t 2010-06-16 20:05:10.000000000 +0200
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
use Apache::TestUtil;
use Apache::TestRequest;
-plan tests => 4, need [qw(cgi include deflate case_filter)];
+plan tests => 4, need [need_cgi, qw(include deflate case_filter)];
my $inflator = "/modules/deflate/echo_post";
my @deflate_headers;
Just noticed this, when running the 2.3.6 tests with threaded MPMs. If
that's OK I'll fix like shown above. The same for t/apache/pr43939.t.
Rainer
