On 06/21/2010 11:37 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 6/21/2010 4:00 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> As I understand it, Rüdiger's patch may be better for caching but uses >> more CPU cycles. But it uses way less CPU than no patch at all. >> Therefore I propose to include that patch unless there is clear >> consensus that Eric's patch is to be preferred. > > Not a significant number, and Rüdiger's patch gathered +1's from myself, > gregames, nick is on the wall with a +.5 - I think your question is to > Rüdiger, with the emphasis on 'what is your decision?' based on this > last rather indecisive posting.
Does someone still have Eric's patch? Seems that I can't find it right now. Regards Rüdiger
