On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 23:17:59 +0200 Graham Leggett <[email protected]> wrote:
> /me would like to understand so he doesn't make the same mistake in > future. I was equally confuzzled (but quiet) until I saw the commit. The problem isn't in the chunk at line 301, it's in the near-identical code at line 342. I still haven't seen a reply to my first question of why the above caused a problem, though it's now clear why the other section might've done. -- Nick Kew
