On 20 Jul 2010, at 07:43, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Is this needed any longer? Shouldn't authz be expected to handle r->user == > NULL after Stefans > recent changes?
Hadn't considered that. An extra check here can't hurt, can it? -- Nick Kew
On 20 Jul 2010, at 07:43, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > Is this needed any longer? Shouldn't authz be expected to handle r->user == > NULL after Stefans > recent changes?
Hadn't considered that. An extra check here can't hurt, can it? -- Nick Kew