On 2010-07-22 at 10:32, "Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dan Poirier [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010 16:21 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: 2.2.16 RC - pr17629.t failure on Linux >> > This is no regression but due to a backport that missed the boat > for 2.2.16. See the STATUS file of 2.2.x and search for 17629. That would explain pr43939.t also, thanks. What about these? t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 8 Failed: 1) Failed test: 7 I don't see any SSL-related proposed backports in STATUS that could explain these. Dan
